Results 175 comments of Phillip

closed as both out of scope and (for now) solved.

closing as stale (nobody is working on this as of now).

Nobody is working on this at present, closing.

This is a feature that is currently not planned to be implemented, closing.

So I (briefly) went after some of these. There is some discussion in https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/pull/1019 and #1011. I think my main feeling was that the namespace on `Diffraction2D` is so crowded...

I'm (softly) pro pyxem/kikuchipy#197 going into diffsims, as that seems to preserve the hyperspy/non-hyperspy distinction we have with pyxem at the moment.

> > I'm (softly) pro [pyxem/kikuchipy#197](https://github.com/pyxem/kikuchipy/pull/197) going into diffsims, as that seems to preserve the hyperspy/non-hyperspy distinction we have with pyxem at the moment. > > No HyperSpy, only `orix`,...