Results 175 comments of Phillip

Just noting here that I'm not planning to touch this during my sweep of the utils.

I'm going to action this, with the plan to retain both: `align_single_frame` & ` _intensity_peaks_image_single_frame` for now. I may well place this functionality elsewhere (with deprecation warnings). Hopefully getting to...

Much of this was done in #1040, but I think we could do with another loop around, so will leave this open.

~#1020 didn't update the changelog. Will sweep this up when I do the next batch of utils.~ Done.

### What's left? - take `signal` private (as `_signals`) - Deprecate all functionality in [radial_utils.py](https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/radial_utils.py) see #1002 - Rename the module [expt_utils.py](https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/expt_utils.py) - Bring dummydata into utils (#1049) ### No...

So with #1032, #1033, #1034 and #1035 I've got this down to 8 that need addressing. If they get technical I'll raise separate issues from now on.

As in the functions in https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/signal.py ?

### Things I'm working on #### For 0.18.0 - [x] Tidy up the utils per #996 - [ ] Bump to sensible versions of our dependencies #1021 - [ ]...

> > #### In the pipe for 1.0.0 > > > > * Return coverage to 100% > > * Set up a functional cron job > > @pc494 What...

> @pc494 What do you think about trying to push for the 0.18.0 release soon. What is still needed to be done (besides the large and daunting [pyxem/diffsims#201](https://github.com/pyxem/diffsims/pull/201) (and #1018)...