Phillip
Phillip
Just noting here that I'm not planning to touch this during my sweep of the utils.
I'm going to action this, with the plan to retain both: `align_single_frame` & ` _intensity_peaks_image_single_frame` for now. I may well place this functionality elsewhere (with deprecation warnings). Hopefully getting to...
Much of this was done in #1040, but I think we could do with another loop around, so will leave this open.
~#1020 didn't update the changelog. Will sweep this up when I do the next batch of utils.~ Done.
### What's left? - take `signal` private (as `_signals`) - Deprecate all functionality in [radial_utils.py](https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/radial_utils.py) see #1002 - Rename the module [expt_utils.py](https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/expt_utils.py) - Bring dummydata into utils (#1049) ### No...
So with #1032, #1033, #1034 and #1035 I've got this down to 8 that need addressing. If they get technical I'll raise separate issues from now on.
As in the functions in https://github.com/pyxem/pyxem/blob/main/pyxem/utils/signal.py ?
### Things I'm working on #### For 0.18.0 - [x] Tidy up the utils per #996 - [ ] Bump to sensible versions of our dependencies #1021 - [ ]...
> > #### In the pipe for 1.0.0 > > > > * Return coverage to 100% > > * Set up a functional cron job > > @pc494 What...
> @pc494 What do you think about trying to push for the 0.18.0 release soon. What is still needed to be done (besides the large and daunting [pyxem/diffsims#201](https://github.com/pyxem/diffsims/pull/201) (and #1018)...