Paul Walker

> 1. Can we call the new types `floatm8_t`, `floatm8x16_t`, `svfloatm8_t`, etc.? This would be more consistent with existing type names while still preserving the "modal" distinction. It also makes...

> There was some discussion on that here [#112564 (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112564#discussion_r1803497212), originally this followed the neon combine that matched `(from_int (to_int))` -- [564d9a7](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/564d9a78713e1f95dbef6a14441b82d77c25f04d), but it was suggested to make it into...

To clarify my previous comment. I'm not suggesting you "must" implement a set of `fp_op->gpr->fpr` combines specific to the sequences you care about. I only used that to illustrate my...