patak

Before the end of the week @kishore-rajendran

@zyakita please create a new issue against the latest version of Vite with a minimal reproduction. Thanks!

@zachbryant could you open a new bug report with a minimal repro against 3.1?

@harrytran998 about ```js terminal.shopping('message') ``` I think this is out of the scope of the library. And you can use your own wrapper utils around console.log to achieve the same...

Closing as stale

> Ok I think this is ready. The one caveat is that we need to use the user-specified `base` for the SSR build (rather than `./`) because otherwise imported assets...

> 2. When building with `base: './'`, workers are instantiated with `new Worker('../../path/to/worker.js')`, rather than with a root-relative path beginning with `base`. But that's wrong — the path will be...

About the need of adding `enforce: pre`, only two of the official plugins need that: https://vite-rollup-plugins.patak.dev/, so it is not the majority, but I think it is nice to have....

Rollup Plugins can still be used when `enforce` or `apply` is needed in Vite. This is the pattern used in Vite ```js import eslint from "@rollup/plugin-eslint" export default { plugins:...

We have a PR that should further help here: - https://github.com/vitejs/vite/pull/7485 About the warning, I think it is too strict. But these are quite useful in most cases. I wonder...