Pat Allan
Pat Allan
Hey folks, very slow response here, but I just wanted to provide _something_ in reply to your messages. And unfortunately, the short answer is: Sphinx can only have one process...
As per @akostadinov's great work, this should now be covered by `ThinkingSphinx::Processor.new(instance: self).sync` - it'll update records if they're still within the scope, or otherwise delete them.
… and this is part of v5.6.0 which has just been released!
Would love to get this merged in - @jdelStrother are you able to rebase? (I can sort it out otherwise)
Re-running them did the trick - it's rare that a full run passes in a single go.
@rpheath it's really dependant on my spare time for OSS, which I feel is much less these days :( Still, trying to get a release out today. I'm just reviewing...
I'm at a bit of a loss as to why this isn't working - but, I guess a starting point: are you using v2.5.0 or newer? As that's when the...
Certainly feels cleaner. Would be great to see this merged in.
Came across this issue while searching for a solution to the same problem - and then I found a fix, so I thought you may want to know :) As...
I'm very open to supporting this - but I don't have any time to make it happen in the near future. So, if you'd like to give it a shot,...