Pat Allan

@afpr252 Just realised I've left this issue dormant for over a year, sorry! 😅 did you manage to get anywhere with a fix, even if it's not polished up into...

I have considered allowing real-time updates/deletions to occur via background jobs… but I've held off because I'm not sure if it's much of a performance benefit? If it happens immediately:...

And just to clarify: I'm not against background jobs for running callbacks in theory, but right now it feels like it involves adding too much code to Thinking Sphinx for...

This is a great suggestion. I've just added the following to the `develop` branch if you want to give it a shot: ```ruby processor = ThinkingSphinx::Processor.new(instance) # to delete from...

Belatedly coming back to this, sorry for the delay! I've pushed a commit today to the `develop` branch that changes the possible arguments for `ThinkingSphinx::Processor`: ``` processor = ThinkingSphinx::Processor.new(instance: instance)...

Thanks for the debugging on this issue! I've just pushed a fix - 150f2ed - and if CI's happy with it, I'll look at getting a new gem release out...

Thanks for logging this issue @kalsan :) It has also been covered by #1213 - but then I reverted that change because it no longer worked with Sphinx, and I...

Hi @bkd - you're right that TS hasn't implemented the HTTP interface for querying Manticore. A workaround might be [using a dynamic attribute](https://freelancing-gods.com/thinking-sphinx/v5/searching.html#dynamic_attributes) which uses your range logic to return...

I'm afraid I don't have any inspiration on what might be causing this - your setup is very similar to [a project of my own](https://github.com/pat/drumknott-server/blob/develop/spec/rails_helper.rb), and [the tests for that](https://github.com/pat/drumknott-server/blob/develop/spec/requests/pages_api_spec.rb)...

… and now that I removed the `:focus` that avoided the full suite from running, I can see that the build is not happy at all with pre-3.0 Rubies. And...