pasi-paasiala

Results 22 issues of pasi-paasiala

New lines after every line are a bit problematic for us, since we are manipulating the properties files also by external tools used by external translators. In this process the...

This is related to the following files: [IDS](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/property/fail-any_matching_value_in_an_enumerated_property_will_pass_3_3.ids) [IFC](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/property/fail-any_matching_value_in_an_enumerated_property_will_pass_3_3.ifc) The IDS requires that the enumerated value has simple value "EXISTING". The actual value of the property contains two values "EXISTING"...

documentation
Test cases

The lines starting from here should be removed, since they're outdated. https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Development/ids.xsd#L67 Here are still the lines, if the line number mentioned above doesn't work due to changes to the...

It is not advisable to target type classes in IFC, since: 1. The users may not be aware of them 2. The users may not have control over them in...

It is possible to specify cardinality for attributes as shown in [this](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/ids/pass-specification_optionality_and_facet_optionality_can_be_combined.ids) example. The specific requirement I'm talking about is this: ``` Description Foobar ``` The interpretation of this is...

discuss
schema

According to [this](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/classification/fail-a_classification_facet_with_no_data_matches_any_classification_1_2.ids) example it is possible to create a classification requirement that is accepted if an object has any classification. That is, it is possible to have this kind...

schema
review

The relation names in version afb04a10ff8cd9178f1665ce5a64198bed87e81a do not match the schema. The relation names should be all upper case. IFCRELASSIGNSTOGROUP instead of IfcRelAssignsToGroup.

documentation

Currently the partof facet seems to be recursive by default as suggested by these [IDS](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/partof/pass-an_aggregate_entity_may_pass_any_ancestral_whole_passes.ids) and [IFC](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/master/Documentation/testcases/partof/pass-an_aggregate_entity_may_pass_any_ancestral_whole_passes.ifc) files. This isn't very clear for example in the case when there's an...

discuss
tests

#190 Relation names made all caps.

All other RequirementsTypes have instructions. Entity should have as well.