Terence Parr
Terence Parr
Maybe @nesevis or @edigaryev can comment. This is much simpler than https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/pull/3969
> one will be able to link against ANTLR 4 statically and [use it from Swift](https://github.com/cirruslabs/tart/blob/c27d4a089c70bf25f0e16f3bc3c5c64ffc5b96ac/Package.swift#L19) without forking this repository. I totally agree. that's what I'm hoping to do here:...
btw, I added a bug about the github actions not installing some targets properly https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/issues/3988
Hi @tonyarnold had a chance to take a peek at this? If you can make [example.zip](https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/files/10096762/example.zip) reuse the existing library we are 99% there!
Well this is kind of disappointing that Swift can't reuse an existing library. Finding it hard to believe but I have no idea. I guess we can only turn off...
I turned off the swift tests with https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/commit/539ffaf63d312d38c98eb57099a4b6a735233fb8
ok. just surprising people have tolerated this lack of build reuse for years. seems odd. make xcode hides this?
@jcking do you feel like taking a look at this PR?
Yeah, let's wait.
Why wouldn't it be simpler to simply check that the users rule name does not start with our magic `T__` prefix?