Pablo Galindo Salgado
Pablo Galindo Salgado
Closing as without a reproducer we cannot investigate
> Hm. @pablogsal do you think it would be reasonable to have our tests build in C99 mode, instead of C23, and LD_PRELOAD a shared library of our own creation...
I am not sure I completely follow the one about "third party". It seems that you want to trigger this when a module it's using its own name and is...
> I'm little worried, users who run into this are typically really new to Python, may barely know what a module is, so it's nice for something to say "consider...
> That's awesome. I see @pablogsal is involved, so "standard for Python C-ish binding frameworks" seems believable. I appreciate the kind words, but I only contributed a small typo fix...
I think at this point you can try to work towards giving us a reproducer so we can investigate. Otherwise there isn't a lot we can do here unfortunately :(
CC @DinoV @Yhg1s
@DinoV I have rebased and added a bunch of tests and a lot of stuff that was missing from the final version of the PEP.
⚠️ Dear reviewers, to avoid collapsing the GitHub API with a lot of comments, please open PRs against the base branch with any suggestions or fixes if you are sure...
@DinoV @colesbury I haven't paid attention to FT when I updated the draft implementation so please take a special look at that