Pablo Galindo Salgado

[Just as a clarification, @GrigoriosGiann is working with us (Python team in Bloomberg) in the Cython support as part of his internship]

> Are there any news on this? Yeah, we will soon do a PR to iterate over :). I was caught in many other responsibilities and could not finish some...

> Hi all! > > I have a small update on the issue since I was working on it a bit in the last time. Basically I have rebased changes...

> I can help out with the review of the grammar and parser changes if that helps you, @pablogsal. Absolutely! I will do a pass but it would be great...

I problem that there is with this particular duality between Types/Callables is that the behaviour of the match is that is not obvious without proper context of what object are...

> * the semantics of that is evaluating whatever is on the left as if it was an expression (it's the same as now, but we now accept more expressions,...

> I understand @viridia opened this to brainstorm around that idea, and I'm following along, but definitely there's no consensus that this is actually a desirable feature. I agree and...

`array.array` objects are now recognized as `MutableSequence` (and therefore `Reversible`) in Python3.10: ``` Python 3.10.0a0 (heads/bpo-29727-dirty:af8fd07361, Jul 5 2020, 19:35:13) [GCC 10.1.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license"...

@brandtbucher I have opened a PR against your branch here: https://github.com/brandtbucher/cpython/pull/6/files

> Depending on timing, I think scouring the standard library for other classes like these that could *really* benefit from `__match_args__` would make a great PyCon sprint. Regarding the proposed...