Claudio Wunder

Hey @erfanium could you rebase this PR? (I'm going to merge after rebase as the @nodejs/docker WG hasn't said anything)

> @AugustinMauroy mentions "the file structure will change". I am under the impression that the goal is to not break any old links. Is the file structure changing? Does that...

@nschonni the % should reflect on what files are mapped inside the %two letter code% folders and maybe with the revision of translation? But I'm not sure.

> Yeah, I haven't looked at it in awhile, but looking now, it seems like the accepted vs translated are 2 separate numbers now Hmmm, interesting. Also to mention, on...

> That's probably OK for your dev cycles, but those files were approved/edited by the language groups through direct PRs to the repo, and likely shouldn't be thrown away. As...

Oh I see, that's enlightening!

> For translation files, there're much more on node.org instead of node.dev in many languages, and I'm not very sure about the differences between the "node.dev" and "node.org". Many of...

Sorry, @MaledongGit but I disagree with **all** of your points. They are nice, but are way too naive for the reality we face right now, and I honestly believe we...

> @ovflowd：Sorry, It seems according to your suggestions, "node.dev" will take place of "node.org"? For many years, the idea has been to redesign nodejs.org, and nodejs.dev was the playground/website redesign...

> Given that some of the arguments for SSR in https://github.com/nodejs/admin/issues/766 are based on the internationalization of the API docs, are there plans to actually translate their contents (which change...