Claudio Wunder

Note that we do that on webpack (the disbursement thing), so does ESLint and other orgs; Given they have a much more smaller contributor base, hence the application of a...

> > those links are not effective. > > That makes sense to me. Because, in my opinion, the readme file is not the place I would look to find...

> We can't be sure of that without giving it a try. I disagree, if we go with that sort of decision making process, we might as well just do...

> This approach aligns with UX best practices, which emphasize the importance of informing users about their actions This is a contradiction. The button clearly says that it will Download...

> In my opinion, the download button on the main page should link to the dedicated download And with all due respect, Im not going to change the current living...

Im not sure if you closed by accident, but if you open an issue at least let more people chime in 😅; other folxs might be interested on this topic...

> > Also the home page was designed by a professional designer with solid UX experience, so could you please point out to references on why this is not a...

This issue got linked on Node's repo so I got curious. You can see the output of our LLMS.txt here: https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/actions/runs/18631409957. Also uploaded it here: https://gist.github.com/ovflowd/428bd7f2abea36eb4140c1c60abfaa61

Yw! Appreciate the ecosystem keeping an 👀 on what we're doing. Feedback also always welcome :)

> (On an unrelated note: it's my first time opening a PR on this repo and I noticed that nearly nobody follows the commit message guideline of starting the commit...