oskarth
oskarth
Does this imply any spec changes? If so this needs a corresponding issue in RFC repo. We need to have the RFC up to date and alive.
@s1fr0 is this something you'd want to look at? Also cc @AtHeartEngineer FYI and in terms of things you or others might find useful here.
Generalization https://github.com/vacp2p/zerokit/issues/71
Example of example usage, pretty neat: https://github.com/Unirep/create-unirep-app > cargo doc Sure we can.
cc @s1fr0 @richard-ramos
The issue is asking for what is in the acceptance criteria: > Proposal of MVP CLI API that allows for interacting with RLN - e.g. create groups, adding members, etc.
Another example is geth https://geth.ethereum.org/docs/interface/command-line-options - people don't write go code to use geth and interact with Ethereum
> Might make sense to "bundle" foundry or similar-based scripts for interacting with smart contracts. Yes it isn't a hard requirement for initial MVP, but it should probably be part...
No strong preferences here. By default it'd probably make sense to use same as arkworks, but maybe fine to use something else if we have good reasons? Not immediately obvious...