oskarth

Leaving open for now to understand security implications a bit better with the tiered phase setup. Though intuitively I agree with above comment (and participated in the ceremony myself!).

Oh it is not participants. I'm quite sure things are fine the way they are! And I agree intuitively re threat model. It is just to close issue I'd like...

> Its the same. PPTau also have a circuit specific phase. So in phase 2 you need 1 of m honest participants. How many participants in the circuit specific phase...

> Its still todo. Ack. > RLN provides just privacy for p2p stuff. It does not provide private transactions. Yeah I know, that is a quote from original issue as...

I have some ideas for how to do this, but would need to dedicate more time to it. I think it'd be very useful to do though.

Thanks @cammellos! I think this is good enough for a start, can update as we go. Helps to have clear problem description from client teams here to make sure we...

Thanks for these numbers, useful! 40k gas seems pretty low, similar to ERC20 transfer. But I agree that they are probably an order of magnitude or two off from what...

I took the liberty of rewriting this issue a bit

Here's what running it on Optimistic public testnet would look like (coming in March, supposedly): - https://community.optimism.io/docs/evm-comparison.html#missing-replaced-and-custom-opcodes - and https://community.optimism.io/docs/integration.html#introduction We'd have to look over contracts to check opcodes etc....

This is a good point, and private settlement is indeed a desideratum. For now, considering the complexity and many unknowns both around the solutions, and L2s in general, I'd probably...