Mariusz Zaborski

@tzizi I'm also not sure. Although could you point me the LE documentation? They suggests that the LE format is similar to the LX. https://github.com/BoomerangDecompiler/boomerang/blob/next/loader/exe/dos4gw/DOS4GWBinaryFile.cpp and http://fileformats.archiveteam.org/wiki/Linear_Executable

@ssokolow If you look into the "Specifications" they look quite the same :) And the "http://faydoc.tripod.com/formats/exe-LE.htm" doesn't look like anything close to the official one. The loader I build look...

@ssokolow Sorry If I was unclear. :) Non the less I would try to use the loader for the LE. Please notice that I do not implement all the object...

I can look into this.

> The two test cases are nearly identical except one makes a 10MB file and the other makes a 1GB file. Could you combine the tests? Yes, I can do...

> ...the zpool scrub will fail and the zfs scrub will continue, with /tank/huge_file being put in the error list? Is that correct? If it's in the error list, will...

> Hmm.. I'm worried that the user will think their files are corrupted when they really arn't. Is there a way around that? We could either create a separate list...

> Unfortunately, I think we would have to do this. We don't want the user to see files flagged in zpool status -v while they are being scrubed. I will...

It seems that we do not implement [mmap(PROT_WRITE)](https://github.com/gramineproject/gramine/blob/master/pal/src/host/linux-sgx/pal_files.c#L261) which is used by this test. In my opinion, this test was added just to have the whole coverage for different flags...

@mkow Sorry I didn't notice you have reopened this issue. I have created PR.