Oliver Schulz
Oliver Schulz
I should have said "aligned", not "synched".
We should take a look at [UnitfulRecipes.jl](https://github.com/jw3126/UnitfulRecipes.jl).
Sounds good.
StaticArraysCore requires Julia v1.6, as does StaticArrays itself now. Accessors currently still accepts Julia v1.3. I think that's why the tests are failing. Increasing the minimum Julia version to v1.6...
> Now the problem is these lines: > ... > ... change StaticArraysCore to declare these functions. Yes, we could ask for that - maybe make PRs to StaticArrays and...
Here's another case for this: ```julia julia> A = [0.0u"s":0.1u"s":1.0u"s"] 1-element Vector{StepRangeLen{Quantity{Float64, 𝐓, Unitful.FreeUnits{(s,), 𝐓, nothing}}, Base.TwicePrecision{Quantity{Float64, 𝐓, Unitful.FreeUnits{(s,), 𝐓, nothing}}}, Base.TwicePrecision{Quantity{Float64, 𝐓, Unitful.FreeUnits{(s,), 𝐓, nothing}}}, Int64}}: (0.0:0.1:1.0) s julia>...
We could call it DistributionsInterface, to stress that's ist mostly about function definitions, not concrete implementations. But whatever the name, I think having definitions of pdf-, cdf- and similar functions...
@Cornelius-G , could you take a look at this? @Micki-D , you too, maybe?
> Would Base.collect(vs::ConstValueShape) = vs.shape.value be sth ValueShapes.jl could provide? Hm, no, I don't think that is a good fit, semantically.
Replaced by #70942, please close this one.