Orien Madgwick

We should be able to get a passing CI build once Rubygems is [upgraded to latest](https://github.com/ruby/setup-ruby/blob/08245253a76fa4d1e459b7809579c62bd9eb718a/action.yml#L11-L16): ```patch --- a/.github/workflows/tests-linting.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/tests-linting.yml @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ jobs: uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1 with: ruby-version:...

Don't forget to add an entry in the change log.

This looks pretty sweet! Do you have further insights gleaned from the last couple of years @patrobinson? It would be nice to have a mechanism to share parameters between environments...

I see some interesting discussion in #256 also.

@patrobinson I hear you. It's hard to contemplate broad-reaching design changes with a constant flow of day-to-day tasks fighting for your attention.

Hi @toote, 👋 Thanks for looking into this. > Would you be able to [allow our contributions to the PR](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork)? Unfortunately, I don't have this option. Perhaps because the source...

Thanks @toote! Go for it 🚀

I see the following methods: #### Cucumber 3 ```ruby Before do |s| s.exception # => # s.feature # => # s.keyword # => # s.language # => # s.location #...

My initial thoughts centre on the added complexity in the processors. There's a lot of added noise here with the extra argument, nested object navigation and more complex class structure....

Well put @vonconrad. Further to the quick fix, if we were to provide the `event_descriptor` as the second argument to the process block, processors will be freed up to ignore...