optout
optout
I found an issue with related topic: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/123 . The proposed note which includes the valid delegations is rather similar to the proposal in this issue.
[NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md) states: "Clients should display the delegated note as if it was published directly by the delegator" (though formulation is not very spec-like) This should be interpreted IMO as a...
It seems that `interactive_tx_signing_session` is not reset at the end of the process. In a test with a payment being done after a V2 establishment, a new commitment was mis-handled...
Changed `NegotiationContext` to store local and remote inputs/output in separate vectors (in separate commit for now)
Rebased after merge of #2981 .
> Apologies for the delay. I've done some initial review and so far LGTM. Did you want to tackle splicing calculations in a separate PR? I was thinking it would...
Folded in proposed comment changes; marked ready for review.
Made some smaller changes according to review comments.
The last review questions made me thinking, if the API can be made more straightforward. The user of the `InteractiveTxConstructor` has to supply the provided outputs (`TxOut`'s), plus it has...
Reworked: - In the `InteractiveTxConstructor::new()`, the type of the contributed outputs has to be specified -- controlled by local node, shared output but all belongs to the local node, or...