octaeder

but the file existes as file.tex (sorry, this may not be immediately obvious from the comments): _in my build folder a file named file.tex exists_

currently you may use extended search 

Just to clarify: How do you execute your macros? I mean, you just could not use those you don't need? Notes: This is espacially interesting for macros executed by triggers....

Thanks for pointing out this. It could be usefull to have an action on folders (in list to the left) which (de)activates all macros in this folder and all subfolders....

The idea is that the action sets or unsets the option on each macro. So, this is compatible with what you want to have.

@sunderme please add label Enhancement to this issue.

I think this is already answered here #3351. In txs you can use the preview feature which allows to quickly render environments or selected text and show the result instream...

@leanhdung1994 can you show in a video editing this picture? ```latex % pdflatex \documentclass[10pt,a5paper]{report} \usepackage[x11names,table]{xcolor} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{math,calc,arrows.meta} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[domain=-4:4,>=Latex,x=10.mm,y=1.mm,thick]\scriptsize \draw[semithick,->] ([xshift=-10pt]-4, 0) -- ([xshift=10pt] 4, 0) node[right] {$x$}; \draw[semithick,->]...

I wonder why you can't write those files. Please try by removing the `prefix` option (`prefix=tikzGnuplot/`) in both cases. You may also shorten the value of the `id` option up...

Still surprising, thanks. I remember that wysiwig latex was already possible on OS/2 in mid 90s.