obo-relations
obo-relations copied to clipboard
oborel
RO is an ontology of relations for use with biological ontologies
CHEBI includes a number of relations that are very useful for queries, in particular conjugate base/acid relations In CHEBI these have no associated logical axioms other than inverse_of (which of...
Should we increase the frequency of the RO meetings? E..g.: Monthly
In order to address RO issues more strategically, should we implement the labels (e.g.,t-shirt sizing: small, medium, large) to guesstimate how much effort is needed to resolve an issue?
In order to clean up the RO issue tracker, how about we sunset/close issues that have been open more than 2 years? If the submitter is still passionate about the...
Help us prioritize the issues in the obo-relations tracker! Go here to see the issues sorted in descending order by priority: https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc Open an issue you're interested in, and add...
In RO there are terms meant for grouping other terms based on certain criteria, virtually delineating a branch. For example, 'RO:0002244 related via exposure to' is a grouping term with...
Continued from https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/1460 Thought we had a ticket for this... The current defs are largely due to me. Currently we have an alternate proposal from @dosumis (can you post the...
The GO intends to add many logical axioms to cell components for spatial relations, based on information curated in Reactome: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/16785 For this we intend to use the surrounded by...
Please format all definitions (IAO_0000115) to capitalize the first word of every definition and to terminate with a period. Presently, this is inconsistent in the files.
[developmentally related to](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002324) is bound to [GO:developmental process](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0032502), which precludes ecosystemic, human, and other development processes - can a more general class be created? I guess it's too far down...
