Nelo-T. Wallus

@ztombol You've written three libraries for bats so far, what do you think of a load mechanism like this? Additionally I've read quite some issues and comments about loading helper...

Additionally I'd like to know how heavy posix compliance weighs in. Since many features of bats are based on non-posix functionality (e.g. `set +-E`/`set +-T`) it doesn't make sense to...

I'd throw my docker file for imapfilter in the ring as well: https://github.com/ntnn/docker-imapfilter

At the time I made the PR `load` didn't even support full qualified paths. For some reason the PR that added fully qualified paths was merged before mine - although...

@xorpaul, r10k can do that because it evaluates the puppetfile as ruby code. I'm doing the same thing in [puppetfiler](https://github.com/ntnn/puppetfiler/blob/master/lib/puppetfiler/puppetfile.rb#L27). I'd propose to execute the Puppetfile, if it is executable...

No tool acting with ssh sessions handles this. The user is responsible for setting up the environment with e.g. GIT_ASKPASS or via shared connections.

Same problem. Without g10k starting to handle HTTPS/SSH/... itself, rather than using libraries or executing external commands, there is no easy way to know if there is a prompt coming...

@xorpaul In ntnn/puppetfiler I've written some code which parses a puppetfile to yaml. One possibility to resolve issues like these could be to extract that functionality to its own gem...

@romainl what do you think? Do you want external dependencies? Another possibility would be to write our own logging library with structured logging - though that might be a bit...

No, having a difference in the code between dev and production is not a choice. I'd rather use a stub file which defines the functions as noops if the logging...