Steve Myers
Steve Myers
See also discussion in #823
I think we need to do a couple things before we can merge this PR: 1. publish release bdk 0.29.1 which has MSRV fixes or just bump MSRV to 1.63...
Do we have a current need for this or can it be moved to a post 1.0 release as a non-breaking internal optimization?
On the one hand I hate adding yet another crate to the project, but if these types will be more or less unchanging and will be needed for the CBF...
> Edit: mhh or maybe if they are all in the same workspace it's just a matter of bumping the version in the `Cargo.toml`, but you can just do `cargo...
Since this is a functional change I moved it to the alpha.4 release.
This is being done via the Alpha 1.0.0 changes with a new `bdk_nakamoto` crate.
@vladimirfomene as we discussed on discord, with the new 1.0 bdk electrum/esplora/rpc clients it's worth taking another look at using a mocking framework instead of or in addition to our...
Moved to beta release since this is a testing issue. Due to level of work to do this may have to push it out to a post 1.0 release.
Is the proposal here to find places in the new 1.0 APIs where we return `LocalOutput` and make sure the function names and docs are updated to not use the...