Lee ByeongJun

I added a test that performs a very simple check [2e9d9ed](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/1653/commits/2e9d9edaded975022374b4e017669bb4f577d86a), and I plan to add more cases later. For now just for saving.

> PS: @notJoon, could you please verbally confirm when you have resolved a conversation instead of using the "Resolve conversation" button? I see. I'll do that next time.

> Please compare stdout using cmp stdout stdout.golden, as many other tests do. Plase understand that I were unable to respond to that comment directly, so I create a separate...

~~I'll investigate on this weekend~~ Maybe fixed

> To improve `UUID` generation, I wanted to add a resolver like `Snowflake`, but from what I've searched, `sync/atomic` is not supported on Gno. Is there another similar package that...

> Hi, when you have time, could you please do a second review of my modifications cc @notJoon @moul @leohhhn The implementation looks good. However, currently only the Snowflake algorithm...

> Thanks for your example :) I think your result for the UUID is better and I wanted to do the same but I saw in gno that `crypto/rand` is...

> That's great! Ideally, we should complete porting `math/rand` to ensure that most Go code using basic functions like `pickRandom(choices)` can still function properly. Thanks! I'm continuing to work on...

> I'm not the expert on this but, since we are talking blockchains and determinism - I assume you plan to use this package just as a demo package, since...

Over the past few days, I created a [test framework]() based on the NIST SP-800-22 [paper]() to verify the random numbers generated in the implementation and performed the verification. I...