nodivbyzero
nodivbyzero
Should we close this PR?
@deankarn I'm pretty confident in this regex. Honestly, I used ChatGPT to optimize the original regex and then tested it with different email addresses. All tests still pass, so I...
@zemzale Would you mind checking if this PR is good to merge?
It's not a bug. The validation behavior you're seeing is due to the fact that rules are applied based on the actual type defined in your struct, not the type...
@deankarn @zemzale Can you please review this PR? This change is required to address high-severity vulnerabilities in golang.org/x/crypto.
@deankarn I'm just trying to understand the reasoning - why test the older version if it's no longer officially supported? Are we planning to address any breaking issues if tests...
@deankarn I've added a new workflow that triggers on pushes to the `master` branch and runs tests using Go versions `1.21` through `1.24`. bb82cbd6abff203bc7eaad7d5ba368108810dbfd
@deankarn @zemzale Whenever you get a chance, could you please review this PR?
Thanks for your contribution! Interesting idea, but the implementation seems limited to a specific date format. Would it still work if the date format is 'January 25, 2025 15:04' or...
I'm not entirely sure about the original design intention for this validator. It might have been intended to validate input values exclusively for the 'Unix' network. However, it would be...