Naman Goel

There are some issues with the idea. 1. `#[]` and `#{}` syntaxes are not supported in Babylon. 1. Alternatively there's a possibly where we could just convert all arrays and...

I have perhaps a more radical idea. What about operator overloading? ## + ``` // Concating lists #[1, 2] + #[3, 4] === #[1, 2, 3, 4] // extending objects/maps...

After looking at some other ES7 proposals, it turns out that associative functions can be important. Specially for parallel operations. So I think we're in a good place if we...

Symbols, are something that should definitely be added to the proposal. About merging Records and Immutable Maps, I still think it's worth exploring, unless there is a strong to be...

The problem is that a normal `=` can't work for most cases. (I don't see any mention of `.get` and `.set` in the documents for vectors. (Which is probably an...

@natew I agree with the subscript based get. But It would only work for vectors and records, as Maps take non-string, non-number strings as well.

I agree that `.get` is something that would need to be kept around. That said subscripts would be a huge benefit as well.

+1

From everything I know about React. If the codebase is written well enough, and Few seems to be, multi-threading should be fairly trivial to implement, for the diffing part. Plus...

@joshaber I just saw Few today, so I don't know how complicated it to implement. I have a lot of experience with React. With React, Pete Hunt was able to...