nimo23

>**But it’s not the same, "multiple trades" or "scaling into a trade"**, or is due to the limited information not clear what you exact try to do… I read again...

>would you be willing to create a draft PR to facilitate collaboration for this? I would not agree with this PR. Looking into https://github.com/wesssup/ta4j/commit/846229d43438b6d94de7989887e64cfebf423759, it is nothing else than a...

>There is now a piece of code that can be used until that time, if someone wants to investigate it more deeply (like @TheCookieLab ) or test it in a...

Would it be better to overwrite `bigDecimalValue()` in its subclasses instead of providing a default method? For example, in `DecimalNum`: ``` @Override public BigDecimal bigDecimalValue() { return delegate; } ```...

@phong-phuong good idea. I am currently working on a PR to fix this bug. The formula `(1 + x) / (1 + enterAndHold) - 1` can only be used if...

>The formula: (1+9)/(1+3) -1 doesn't come into play, nor make sense **because we are not talking about returns or Return on Investment**. To abstract your last phrase: "..because we are...

>No, the formula you are referring to can be used with both percent and absolute values. The formula measures the difference in change compared to a base value. I was...

>Apply the formula: (User strategy)/(Enter and hold) - 1 = 9/3 - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2 I know, this is common sense:) I only got irritated because...

Ok, I think there are misunderstandings due to a lack of information: When we compare `x` versus `EnterAndHold`, then the `EnterAndHold` always represents 1 (= 100%), i.e. if `x >1`,then...

Example for `+/-`-criteria: `x` versus its `EnterAndHold` => `ratio = x / EnterAndHold` => 1. ratio is positive for `-x / -EnterAndHold` => 2. ratio is negativ for `-x /...