Niklas Mollenhauer
Niklas Mollenhauer
In its current state, it's just a proposal that is subject for discussion. So feel free to post some questions, use-cases and enhancements! :)
Maybe another wording could be something like "Inequality Types" originating from [inequalities](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality_(mathematics))
That should be possible aswell (when generic support is implemented, the playground does not support that).
> can it works well with template type ? > > ```ts > type Hex = (>=0) & ( type HexStr = `0x${Hex}` > ``` I don't think that this...
This proposal does not define any kind of integer semantics and it's currently not the goal. Integer types which have `number` as a base type [seem to](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/195) [be out-of-scope](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/4639). However,...
Yeah, maybe an intrinsic implementation for generic types like `GreaterThan` would be more DX-friendly. That also wouldn't require an extension to the grammar.
Anyone found a workaround for this issue?
Is there anything that I can do to get this merged? I'm trying to reduce warnings on `npm install`.
Node 19 is now out, which means that Node 18 is now the current LTS.
My application heavily depends on that. Any schedule/ETA? If not, is the current `master` branch stable? If so, I'd reference this in my `package.json`.