Nils Goroll
Nils Goroll
This ticket is to ask for a decision on a storage configuration interface change, triggered by the _special_ stores `rxbuf` and `Transient`: The current storage configuration format is `-s=[,arguments]`. This...
This change is to drop the ban mutex while stevedores are munging on the serialized ban list. While I would value his feedback, it is my understanding that @mbgrydeland does...
For this change on top of #3845, `varnishadm` returns with status code 0, despite the vcl init failing: ```diff diff --git a/bin/varnishtest/tests/m00000.vtc b/bin/varnishtest/tests/m00000.vtc index a5d94aca4..4fbe4e86f 100644 --- a/bin/varnishtest/tests/m00000.vtc +++ b/bin/varnishtest/tests/m00000.vtc...
I am pretty sure this has been discussed before, but I stumbled over it again and would like to revisit because I experienced it to be very un-pola: We print...
It is possible to parametrize filters through programmatic access to `VRT_priv_task()` from vmod functions and the filter code. But I see no way to access VCL_PRIVs from filter code. Can...
Trying to use zlib from a vmod would lead to conflicts because the varnish-defined zlib symbols were found first.
This is the continuation of #3285 based on the [bugwash feedback](https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/pull/3285#issuecomment-644143679). It is submitted as a draft PR to gather feedback first before spending more time on the missing bits,...
Just polish some bits which I noticed while working in something else. On hold until after release. flexelint has been run locally with no new reports.
This PR is the implementation of the bugwash agreement in https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/pull/3836#issuecomment-1230335147 I am opening a new PR to properly document the performance implications of the alternative approaches. I ran the...
... for non-default PREFIX installs of varnish I hope we'll be using @Dridi 's new m4s soon, but I just need this to work _now_ :)