Nemanja Patrnogic
Nemanja Patrnogic
Does it make sense to reference NIST recommendations (or any other body) when it comes to key sizes, which hash algorithms with which key size and etc for a subset...
Dumb question, but if the `iat` leaks, don't then `exp` or `nbf` leak as well?
@tplooker @babisRoutis thank you for the answers! Just a follow up, do we expect this to change in the future where a client will be the one choosing a particular...
@babisRoutis Can't say I have a strong opinion regarding weather the wallet should be able to choose, but at the same time I am not sure how much sense it...
By doing interop with wallet providers I've noticed that there is a bit of confusion regarding the proof / no-proof flows and how the nonces are communicated to the wallet....
If possible I would like some examples to be included in cases where the `vp_token` is a base64url encoded string. Not sure if this still makes sense given the move...
Given that presentation_submission structure is / or should be moving away from the spec, this line sould maybe be removed or amended as it is in the main `Response` section...
Our experience is that PE supports a lot of functionality that on paper sounds useful, but that in the end leads to a lot of complexity when trying to build...
Thank you for the answer! Just to repeat to see if my understanding is correct here. When you say `display information` we are talking about information carried in the `display`...
I think the `jti` variant makes sense. Would this be a purely Wallet side mechanism, no Issuer involvement needed?