Nemanja Patrnogic

@peppelinux I was thinking more about who is protecting who in this case. Wasn't sure where the responsibility for safety of this interaction lies, and if the Issuer will need...

Small brain dump, I apologize in advance for possibly saying things people know, have discussed, or just plain incorrect things The way I see it: - Request payloads can be...

If I see it correctly this PR also addresses https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/394, right? Also, not sure about the process, but do we need to add the notes for the next draft regarding...

In general not against the idea but have some questions/thoughts: - Would we do full override where we do not even look at the structure in the issuer medatada, or...

Up until maybe version 21? when using DIDs with OpenID4VP in the implementation I worked on we used to put the `client_name` in the `client_metadata` of the JAR request. I...

> I think if a did profile of openid4vp... @jogu Do you know if any such profiles exist in the wild, or are in the works? I remember a few...

I always saw `did:` support here as an enabler for DID centric ecosystems, and then it is their business what specific DID methods they want to use, what key types...

With the risk of sounding stupid, what would the expectation be here, for verifiers that currently use DIDs to switch to a different client_id_scheme like federation, x509, or attestation JWTs?

We too use DIDs, and we haven't had too much problems with implementing it to be completely honest for the methods we chose to support. Now I agree, there are...

Where did we land regarding this, is the plan to do a new spec/profile regarding DIDs and JWTs/SD-JWTs, did anyone start working on this? Does anyone need any help?