Neelesh Bodas

yes, अच्छषिष्यत् is correct. Will fix at my end. On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 12:46 AM Dr. Dhaval Patel ***@***.***> wrote: > @neeleshb > It seems that the form...

शिष् is mentioned as अनिट् in बृहद्धातुकुसुमाकर, Page 166 entry No. 687. That is the source for ashtadhyayi.com entry for this dhatu. Same dhatu in Dhaturoopanandini on page 126 (Entry...

Pasting my own commentary as an image. Reference from Bhashya is also provided. (Sutra 1.1.7 हलोऽनन्तराः संयोगः) Also, तत्त्वबोधिनी has this line in this context - "यत्र बहवः हलः संश्लिष्टाः,...

Also a direct reference for this use-case is in 7.4.53 यीवर्णयोर्दीधीवेव्योः in SK `सन्ति ... सन्तः । संस्तन्ति । बहूनां समवाये द्वयोः संयोगसंज्ञा नेत्याश्रित्य स्कोः-[(कौमुदी-३८०)](https://ashtadhyayi.com/sutraani/sk380) इति लोपाभावात् । संस्ति ।...

Looks like same issue for a few other places, E.g. पुष्णाति.

1) In the prakriya for आयियत्, the द्वित्व is happening in presence of `चङ्`, hence the candidate of द्वित्व is `ई + णिच्`, and not the whole verb form namely...

No अजाद्यतष्टाप् is not optional in general. But उष्णिह् is itself feminine, so it can be used as it is. And it still gets टाप् because it is included in...

There is no "official standard list of vartikas" . But what I have done is collected all vartikas that appear in Bhashya. That's the data which appears in that json.