David Nedrud
David Nedrud
Great. I can make some changes. When you say > On hamiltons, the model is to do it at a fixed height Is that fixed height calculated based on the...
I used a tip to determine the x,y,z position of the "knobs" on the tecan deck. For rail 1, left is 101, front is 276 (machine value = inverted), bottom...
I used a tip to determine the x,y,z position of the "knobs" on the tecan deck. For rail 1, left is 101, front is 276 (machine value = inverted), bottom...
> one answer is that we don't understand tecan's definition of off_y correctly This is definitely true for me. There seems to be many attributes involved in the calculation not...
This addresses issue: Status: Open. #580
Perhaps I used "coordinate system" incorrectly. I changed both the placement of carriers on the rails and then the inverse calculation for the y coordinate. For the placement of carriers,...
> i am confused. shifting the origin of the coordinate system would work if every carrier had the same offset, but that is not the case. "Most off_x values are...
> we don't know for sure but that seems likely and physically plausible no? > > > > (if you happen to have carriers with different off_{x,y}, could you take...
> as i mentioned in the other post, the way i would solve the off_xy (to get rid of TecanCarrier) is define it in the universal Carrier and set it...
> new carriers? for other resources it shouldn't ™ be needed Yes. I meant to say new carriers. Tube and trough carriers. >my interpretation: the carriers always slide all the...