Nicolas Consigny

> @nconsigny could you add a section "Security considerations"? If there are no considerations of this sort, write it anyway (saying that there are no such considerations). Done ✅

> I've heard Starkware (SW) and Starknet Foundation (SNF) have iterated and found an alternative design for the Security Council. Can someone from SW or SNF modify this Pull Request...

@Eikix updated with the poause flow and a few modifications, wdyt ?

As elsewhere for HWW I would suggest to have a look at those contracts : [alchemyplatform/modular-account](https://github.com/alchemyplatform/modular-account) [AmbireTech/ambire-common](https://github.com/AmbireTech/ambire-common/blob/feature/eip-7702/contracts/AmbireAccount7702.sol) [MetaMask/delegation-framework](https://github.com/MetaMask/delegation-framework) [Ethereum Foundation AA team](https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/blob/develop/contracts/accounts/Simple7702Account.sol)

Hey there, Posting a list of known implementations, if you have any question I'm here to help : Alchemy : https://github.com/alchemyplatform/modular-account Ambire : https://github.com/AmbireTech/ambire-common/blob/feature/eip-7702/contracts/AmbireAccount7702.sol Metamask : https://github.com/MetaMask/delegation-framework AA team EF...

I can probably come up with something for the reproducible firmware on hardware I can do that as part of the Trezor research #197

https://github.com/walletbeat/walletbeat/pull/205 This PR refactors the hardware wallet integration criterion for software wallets

Thanks for commenting @nixorokish , > i don't think this is enough of norm yet for it to be a hard-and-fast rule Currently **EIPs that are not proposed are not...

@g11tech Yes I do feel strongly about it. It is the basis upon which the improvement process (BIP / PEP) have been built. The design ensures that anyone reading PEP-0001...