n3101

@sw96411 We don't believe our code should impose this restriction, but right now do not have the resources to consider all the consequences you outline. As one of the breaking...

@d21211122 said: "I'm not sure what the solution should be, but I remember going through this problem and we definitely need a solution, and there shouldn't be Accumulo specific code...

ok I was tempted. This might be salvageable, but doesn't have to be in 2.0

A conversation elsewhere: n3101: "- do you agree with @d47853's assertion: "Validation should be added to directed fields in schemas. " @d21211122: "I don't know if I do agree with...

@j8934893 Hiya, please can I remind you about the question above? We have various predicate-related stuff in the backlog, so add anything you have in mind here. Otherwise I will...

@p3430233 - in what file format? Just Linux?

It is possible that the forthcoming merging of the FedStore rewrite will fix this. As part of the alpha3 work, test this bug again after the merge has been done....

Following a discussion between @gaffer01 and @d21211122 it has been decided that this will not be included in Gaffer 2.0. While this will not be implemented against the Accumulo store,...

@GCHQDev404 The status of this issue is unclear. PR #2393 might have resolved it but that was closed in favour of #2394 which merged code from d47853. Can this issue...

After discussion, this item won't be handled as part of the [ now alpha-4] fedstore merging, but will be reviewed as part of alpha-5 and a decision taken then as...