Mateusz Woś

Thanks all for the conversation over this topic. There's nothing more I could add, all concerns, comments are valid in my opinion. Unfortunately, the change would break backward compatibility. Such...

Hi @bendh1! Unfortunately `Pow` method is only working with Integer exponents right now. This is ongoing issue that must be fixed and we are aware of that. First PR that...

I've already responded in the linked issue. I think we might try initialization via NewBigInt to not to lose precision.

@kstenerud Good point. Yes, we are not handling negative zeros atm. Negative zeros are mostly used in mathematical analysis, so I think there are no many cases right now that...

Hi @jackykwandesign! Those two methods are not within the 1.2.0 release. They exist on the master branch and they will be released with version 1.3.0. You can freeze the library...

Thanks for the kind words :D. Hard to say when exactly the 1.3.0 version will be released. For sure we want to finally implement a better version of the `Pow`...

Hi @sineycoder! :D It's not exactly a precision problem, it's just how `Div` works. `Div` uses the `DivisionPrecision` variable to indicate the number of decimal places in the result when...

Hi! Yup, `Pow` still misfunction. As far as I remember I didn't merge PR with sqrt as it was missing unit tests. I can check if this functionality is working...

Sorry, I had no time to do anything with decimal last week. I will try to validate the correctness of implementation #130 tomorrow.

Yes, that's right. This issue is still not fixed. I was working on that some time ago and I've already prepared an implementation of exp funcs #229 that will be...