muvaffak

Opened a PR to cover my [tasks](https://github.com/cncf/crossplane-conformance/issues/4#issuecomment-856206528) https://github.com/crossplane/provider-aws/pull/707 Some require manual intervention, a simple script that can do operations like `kubectl patch` (to disable distribution before deletion) or `docker pull`...

@negz some of the resources inherently require manual intervention to work, like disabling `Distribution` before deletion for a successful deletion. Is it possible to mark them conformant after making sure...

@twz123 Sure, added to the logs section in the description.

Related to https://github.com/crossplaneio/crossplane/issues/1140

> One challenge with this approach is that the statically provisioned managed resource's configuration must match that of the existing resource; if it does not Crossplane will immediately update the...

In order to import a resource, the following information should be given at the bare minimum: * Service type * Identifier in the cloud provider, i.e. the value for `crossplane.io/external-name`...

@nalshamaajc I think using [observe-only management policy](https://docs.crossplane.io/knowledge-base/guides/import-existing-resources/#import-resources-automatically) can get you what you want.

I think that feature would be awesome, too. I control pi-blaster from nodejs and because of nodejs's asynchronous structure, there is no proper delay function(if you don't count locking the...

@avagin That patch did make the error go away and I was able to take the checkpoint. Thank you! However, I wasn't able to validate that the checkpoint is correctly...

@avagin Huh I didn't realize that. I think, for starters, having an `--udp-close` flag similar to TCP would unlock part of the use cases where the both sides of the...