muvaffak

Results 206 comments of muvaffak

> Another interesting use case - 2 apps want to connect to the same database. Currently they have to be in the same namespace in order to share a secret?...

I simply created this resource in a fresh cluster and looked at the content of the secret with `kubectl get secret conn-secret-name -n default -o jsonpath='{.data.password}' | base64 -d` Since...

@dsyer Just checked the codebase again and you're right. I thought we changed the how `reclaimPolicy` works but it seems we just added a new functionality. So, right now, `reclaimPolicy:...

I see that `User` is a [standalone API object](https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/admin-api/rest/v1beta4/users#User), meaning we will likely have a CRD for that type in Crossplane, too. In current phase, we're working towards enabling key...

Hi @tomkerkhove ! What do you mean by scaling here? If it means to have more than one instance of the controller pod, it'd not really work with Kubernetes controllers...

Hi @wfaler ! Yes, there is [Provider Dev Guide](https://crossplane.io/docs/v1.2/contributing/provider_development_guide.html) as a doc and also a [video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvQ8N0u3rkE&t=7s) where I'm implementing GCP PubSub managed resource that you can follow along. Feel free...

Per https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/pull/1129 , we have defined how sensitive inputs should be handled. Implementing this issue would serve as an example.

I missed the community meeting, but I agree that a separate provider would make sense. I'm not sure about the naming though. There could be several `v1beta*` in GCP as...

Are we sure that there will not be a `v2` or `v2beta1` that might necessitate a difference between `gcp` and v2 `gcp`, `gcp-beta` and v2beta1 `gcp-beta`?

Got it, sounds good to me. Thanks for the explanation!