Matthew Treinish

Sure, on the aarch64 system I'm running the /proc/cpuinfo contents: ``` Processor : AArch64 Processor rev 4 (aarch64) processor : 0 model name : AArch64 Processor rev 4 (aarch64) BogoMIPS...

Yes I believe so, there were 4 active physical cores on that device when I read /proc/cpuinfo. (The CPU actually has more cores, but switches between them dynamically based on...

Sure, no problem: `'Processor\t: AArch64 Processor rev 4 (aarch64)\nprocessor\t: 4\nmodel name\t: AArch64 Processor rev 4 (aarch64)\nBogoMIPS\t: 26.00\nBogoMIPS\t: 26.00\nFeatures\t: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32\nCPU implementer\t: 0x41\nCPU architecture: 8\nCPU...

@giampaolo the machine @fungi is using is a different arm system than mine. I expect if I ran `lscpu` on mine it would return 4 cpus. I just don't have...

@giampaolo I just ran `lscpu` on my system and got: ``` Architecture: aarch64 Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 10 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Off-line CPU(s) list: 4-9 Thread(s) per core:...

I also just spun up a raspberry pi 3 b+ running a current aarch64 kernel (v4.19.1) and ran the commands on that too for comparison: - /proc/cpuinfo contents: ``` processor...

As @georgios-ts pointed out in https://github.com/Qiskit/retworkx/issues/614#issuecomment-1132994184 the underlying issue might be that the new `pymethods` approach is setting `mp_length` and `pyproto` is setting `sq_length`.

I was thinking about this a bit more, maybe in the interest of compatibility we can add an explicit sequence flag to `pyclass` like is already there for mapping. If...

I've been using [reno](https://docs.openstack.org/reno/latest/) for this but it's in python and only has built-in integration with sphinx/rst. The nice thing with it though is that it uses git history to...

> Hmm, building docs started to fail after merging the main branch. Is this an instance of "things may go wrong on week-ends"? There was a new sphinx release over...