Michael Lynch

This is now fixed with H.264 streaming mode.

Thanks for chasing this down, @Kangie! Isn't that a bug on traefik's side? How can the client not have a TCP port number?

>Do you have a log of those runs? Sure, here they are: * Without Nix/Cachix: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/mtlynch/whatgotdone/2246/workflows/90b8dffb-d7bb-4e4f-80a8-1a4df7b936cf/jobs/8680 * With Nix/Cachix: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/mtlynch/whatgotdone/2257/workflows/091db4f9-7d82-47b1-a346-0f032c99416a/jobs/8750

@domenkozar - Sure, thanks for publishing the new version! It seems to have sped it up quite a bit. It's now 86s as opposed to 146s pre-1.6.1. https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/mtlynch/whatgotdone/2257/workflows/113fd2d4-b575-4f80-9169-b3c82f6bc674/jobs/8790 Is that...

>it's not, there should be no overhead at all. Right, I'm not expecting overhead from Cachix, but I was wondering how much I should expect Cachix to reduce the time...

Ah, interesting. I [consolidated to a single nixpkg](https://github.com/mtlynch/whatgotdone/commit/51ea9cf59c5a228b9bfc49b965c6864d3e5111dd), which brings it down to [55s](https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/mtlynch/whatgotdone/2264/workflows/c8184de4-2f4f-437f-8af8-2b9c6c8b8c50/jobs/8829). Is that about maximum expected performance with Cachix?

@cghague - Can you share more detail on each of these methods? It's currently hard for a teammate to review the ratings or weigh in because we're currently not really...

@cghague - Thanks! This is good progress. I'd like to bring in the rest of the team for discussion. Can we consolidate the details into the root bug? The things...

@cghague - Thanks, I think we're pretty close. ## Defining the UX One thing I'm realizing we're missing is what the user experience looks like in the proposed solutions. Can...

>Regarding your request to clarify the risks associated with config scripts, I think this might be down to my interpretation of what "code change" actually means. I agree that it...