mst

Thanks for your quick reply and fix! The create statements look fine but unfortunately the table names now exceed the default 63 character limitation of Postgres (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27865770/how-long-can-postgresql-table-names-be). As a consequence...

Thanks, and sorry for my late reply.. I tested both commits; at the moment the problem remains for the generation of the `REFERENCES` statement. For example ``` CREATE TABLE SystemInformationBlockType1V1320IEsFreqHoppingParametersDlR13...

Hi, thanks! I tried the latest commit and the reference statements seem to be fixed now :+1: However I get errors because of references to yet not created tables. I...

Hi @tanyeun have a look at the [proj3rd](https://github.com/proj3rd) project. They have a tool to convert the 3gpp doc files to the ASN.1 spec and have ready to use specs as...

Thanks for your quick response! > However, for determinism, probably we should not apply docker-default profile by default even when it exists. Basically I agree with you! However, maybe this...

Yes the `tac` workaround solves the first problem. Thank you! I agree, the advanced sorting wouldn't be trivial, but maybe something to consider for a redesign someday. ;)

Ok let me try to explain the differences by the following example: ``` > todo [ ] 1 (no due date) minor todo [ ] 2 2023-12-31 mid todo [...

> And regarding the `tac`/`--no-reverse` equivalence, it does not seem to yield the same results for me after all. I don't know why I thought it does before but it...

> > Expected behavior would be that all tasks with a start date set in the past are listed here. > > Expected behavior is to list tasks where `STATUS=IN-PROCESS`....

Thank you for the explanation! > TBH, I'm pretty sure that what you want is the ability to edit status=IN-PROCESS. Yes, what I miss is the ability to edit/toggle the...