Manfred Touron

For Snapshot questions, please use the #18 issue.

 What about: - removing #tokenomics, #governance - renaming #atom-one-constitution to #constitution - adding a #atomone-hub Goal: we just have the 3 main projects (#constitution, #govno, #atomone-hub) and 2 special...

What timezone are you in? CET. What topic do you want to talk about? - AMA. - Connect with individuals willing to contribute, determine their areas of expertise, and direct...

How about ensuring that Decentralists never control more than 50% of $ATOM1 shares and voting power, and possibly even less, like 1/3? This way, the proof-of-stake hub will always be...

I'm all for the alignment we're aiming at (100%). Yet, I believe this proof-of-stake hub could be stronger when its stakers have a say, like voting rights. Maybe we can...

@linhpn99, in this new round of reviews, I found the same issues I had previously mentioned. The helper is not functioning as the title suggests, and it should not exist...

What's the current stack trace? Is this issue occurring only in the context of `gno test`, or can you find other execution contexts exhibiting the same behavior?

Can we have at least one unit test not checking that "a string is printed", but actually checking that the hash looks correct?

We need to align this pull request with #1776 to ensure consistency and idiomatic usage. I suggest waiting for #1776 to be merged before merging this one. cc @gfanton

How about we continue having meetings just for identified members, but make sure to publicly share the meeting records? For those wanting to stay anonymous, they can send their thoughts...