Simon Hoinkis

@FerdinandSpitzschnueffler @elfenpiff Could you please review this PR? Thanks :pray:

@byrnexu Closing this issue. Feel free to re-open if you have further questions.

@elfenpiff I never understood why `cxx::unique_ptr` was implemented like it is today in the first place. IIRC @ithier wanted to store the same `cxx::unique_ptr`s with different deleters in a container,...

@elfenpiff I'm unsure if we should pursue this goal. I completely understand your intentions behind and even agree on them. However, we aim for `iceoryx_hoofs` being an independent, stand-alone library....

@elfenpiff I can take care about extending the FAQ.

Moved open tasks to #1745

@elfenpiff Thanks for creating this error! I checked the SEI CERT C++ rule-set mentioned in the [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#safety--security): It's quite plausible that terminating the program abruptly without calling the d'tor may...

@SomnathHolkar Just a short FYI: @MatthiasKillat is currently on vacation and comes back in CW35.

FYI @dlo-86 [Structure101](https://structure101.com) would be another option besides Lattix to analyse the architecture. However, I've had a glimpse at Lattix last Friday and found the DSM and its metrics quite...

> do you think this is related to iceoryx_hoofs? @elBoberido Nope, I think this issue is mainly `iceoryx_posh` related. As discussed today, any architecture guidelines and their respective CI checkers...