Morten Piibeleht
Morten Piibeleht
I thought we already have an issue for this, but I couldn't find it. > I understand that sometimes the page is no longer there but I think at least...
Closing in favor of #2799.
Yep, good to have a dedicated issue. The interface should, basically, be that you provide MarkdownAST AST data structure as a page. CommonMark could potentially be special cased though, so...
I think the short answer here is that for an at-example block, no. But it should work as you expect if you convert it to a doctest. We expect the...
Yep, a keyword argument for the at-blocks. I think #1447 is adjacent to this.
This is a good idea, but I think it should be done as an extension package in the first instance. One big thing we're missing is the Markdown syntax for...
> Why should this error, is more the question to me. A warning seems sufficient? In particular on CI, people don't see warnings. If we don't error, people will not...
> Can we at least have the error occur only in CI, then? No, sorry, I'm pretty strongly against this. We've been trying to move _away_ from this type of...
Just for future reference: the motivating use case is basically auto-generated package-like code that also has a documentation build attached. That code doesn't always live in a Git repo, but...
Hmm? It looks like DocumenterVitepress doesn't actually have tests? :sweat_smile: ``` ERROR: LoadError: Package DocumenterVitepress did not provide a `test/runtests.jl` file ``` https://github.com/JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl/actions/runs/14159569941/job/39663202136