mohamedelshami

Thanks, Rachid, this is a good proposal. By random message, do you mean arbitrary-sized message?

@SweeXordious it's definitely a good idea. Pretty sure there's a good a number of open issues related to lack of documentation.

Thanks Mark for bringing this up. I'm not fully sure what would be the implication on the published releases and application dependent on web3j if we add support for AMN...

Hi, @karalabe @yutianwu would it be possible to get your help reviewing the above PR? this has been outstanding for a few months now. The change will enable interoperability for...

Hi @calmacfadden, thanks for pointing this out. This is a minor change and seems harmless. I would expect this to apply to all `org.web3j.protocol.core.*` response classes. I believe you're referring...

Assume this complete

hi @dman-sol there is no short-term plan to support later versions of Java, this is primarily to dependencies on core Crypto and protocol libarires. But it's something we will look...

hey, @lukerQuant @lukerQuant we are going through a long backlog of issues to close for web3j, has this issue been reproduced recently using the latest web3j version v4.9.4?

@sahashuvo @chris-stallings-pol closing this, support for eth_feeHistory was [added](https://github.com/web3j/web3j/commit/3e7250b78250c02c565356bc8ab65065dd6e46c7) a while back.

@toidv @hoanganhtuan95ptit the PR was merged, please feel free to reopen if required.