moewew

Results 417 comments of moewew

Please note that the EDTF draft standard has been superseded by the upcoming ISO8601 novella, so `biblatex` will cease to support EDTF format and will move to ISO8601. `biblatex` 3.9...

In case you want to read up on what PLK has done to implement these changes, a few comments are scattered in https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/540, https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/644, https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/656. The dev branch of `biblatex`...

Thanks for reporting this. I'm guessing it has to do with the case changing code switching between releases. It would be a bit painful to have to mark up each...

In particular ```latex \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[turkish, shorthands=:!]{babel} \begin{document} \MakeUppercase{i\c{c}inde} \MakeUppercase{\.{i}\c{c}\.{i}nde} \end{document} ``` also seems to have changed between TeX Live 2021 and TeX Live 2022 (as available on Overleaf).

Related: https://github.com/latex3/babel/issues/189

As far as I understand the `\noinherit{subtitle}` does not work in the MWE because the default inheritance setup has https://github.com/plk/biblatex/blob/23cdfb68e0209946350f7fa1940900e133964d0c/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.def#L1738-L1746 The default inheritance comes before your added rules. If Biber...

Currently `cleanthesis` is setting quite some options with `biblatex` but hides this from the user. Especially ``` natbib=true, hyperref=true, backref=true, isbn=false, url=false, doi=false, ``` can cause trouble, because standard `biblatex`...

This actually leads to problems for some users [format of double quotation marks in biblatex with template scrreprt](http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/277425/35864). (Another one at [Double quotation marks back in front on article type...

Given that `beamer` essentially turns the bibliography into an `itemize` with the little icons as bullets, the approach in https://github.com/samcarter/beamer/commit/66205aa0c07c682beaff6cbb32360beb233cc70e that makes this explicit by properly defining a list format...

Sorry, I don't speak Portuguese, so English will have to be enough. This was reported in https://github.com/abntex/biblatex-abnt/issues/53 and fixed in `dev` with https://github.com/abntex/biblatex-abnt/pull/54, but apparently the `dev` branch hasn't been...