Trac2GitHub Transition of Modelica Assocication Projects

**Comment by hansolsson on 24 Jun 2015 12:00 UTC** Replying to [comment:8 sjoelund.se]: > I am sure. It was a direct quote from semver.org. You are correct that they should...

**Modified by dietmarw on 18 Sep 2015 07:56 UTC**

**Comment by henrikt on 23 Sep 2015 10:37 UTC** In order to bring the discussion back to the ticket, I'll try to summarize the main problems that need to be...

**Comment by henrikt on 24 Sep 2015 14:27 UTC** Some scenarios to support the discussion: 1. LibA depends on LibB v 3.2.1, user uses LibA without making modifications to it....

**Comment by hansolsson on 25 Sep 2015 08:36 UTC** First a minor clarification about current status and semantic versioning, which will then lead to more complicated issues (that haven't gotten...

**Comment by choeger on 25 Sep 2015 09:40 UTC** Since I am not at the meeting, just a few comments: * Package managers require a defined (partial) order of versions....

**Comment by henrikt on 25 Sep 2015 10:00 UTC** It seems like we are all pretty much on the same page. To me, there appears to be several important subtopics...

**Comment by henrikt on 25 Sep 2015 10:16 UTC** Replying to [comment:13 hansolsson]: >I am not sure that we can make an informed decision whether semantic versioning should be required...

**Comment by hansolsson on 30 Sep 2015 13:12 UTC** I realized something related to versions. The different version schemes mostly differ in how they construct ONE string containing all parts...

**Comment by henrikt on 1 Oct 2015 07:18 UTC** I think that having a single string containing the entire version is better, since it allows the very same string to...