Trac2GitHub Transition of Modelica Assocication Projects

Results 293 comments of Trac2GitHub Transition of Modelica Assocication Projects

**Comment by stefanv on 22 May 2017 17:10 UTC** Replying to [comment:7 Francesco Casella]: > Replying to [comment:6 Christoff Bürger]: > > I guess what is currently in the MCP...

**Comment by anonymous on 23 May 2017 11:38 UTC** Replying to [comment:8 Stefan Vorkoetter]: > Replying to [comment:6 Christoff Bürger]: > > I do not feel comfortable with any of...

**Comment by cbuerger on 23 May 2017 11:40 UTC** Above post was me; forgot to login.

**Comment by stefanv on 23 May 2017 12:13 UTC** Replying to [comment:10 anonymous]: > Given that `Unit("ohm")` simply returns the value `1.0` with the specified unit, what is the semantic...

**Comment by fcasella on 23 May 2017 12:34 UTC** Replying to [comment:10 anonymous]: > Given that `Unit("ohm")` simply returns the value `1.0` with the specified unit, what is the semantic...

**Comment by hansolsson on 23 May 2017 13:11 UTC** Replying to [comment:7 Francesco Casella]: > Replying to [comment:6 Christoff Bürger]: > > I guess what is currently in the MCP...

**Comment by fcasella on 23 May 2017 13:41 UTC** Replying to [comment:14 Hans Olsson]: > > When defining the constants, we should try to follow authoritative recommendations such as [this](http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html),...

**Comment by hansolsson on 23 May 2017 14:48 UTC** Replying to [comment:15 Francesco Casella]: > Replying to [comment:14 Hans Olsson]: > > Note in particular that `2*kg` is not according...

**Comment by hansolsson on 24 Oct 2017 12:20 UTC** Calling a function with a literal should be included in the list of exceptions. E.g. if foo takes an argument of...

**Comment by anonymous on 24 Oct 2017 13:28 UTC** For functions, I think we must be careful so that we don't destroy the possibility to do good unit checking of...