Trac2GitHub Transition of Modelica Assocication Projects

**Comment by edo.drenth on 21 Apr 2017 16:16 UTC** Let me start with saying that testing is very important. But, I am unsure if it is possible to have one...

**Comment by cbertsch on 3 May 2017 19:36 UTC** Additionally, the compliance checker currently does not check, if initial unkwnowns are defined according to p.60 of the FMI 2.0 specification...

**Comment by iakovn on 17 Dec 2012 21:48 UTC** I don’t see any proper use case for this feature. FMU that raises such exceptions should be run under a debugger...

**Comment by anonymous on 18 Dec 2012 12:19 UTC** I suppose a clean program termination would always be professional. That's why I suggested it. But you are right it is...

**Comment by jakesson on 18 Dec 2012 13:34 UTC** Replying to [comment:2 anonymous]: > I suppose a clean program termination would always be professional. That's why I suggested it. But...

**Comment by anonymous on 18 Dec 2012 16:25 UTC** Sorry, there should not be any offense here. Actually, what I did, is to use log level 6 to see where...

**Comment by iakovn on 18 Dec 2012 22:42 UTC** Replying to [comment:2 anonymous]: > But you are right it is not needed at all as FMU Checker runs on one...

**Comment by jakesson on 19 Dec 2012 08:09 UTC** I think that both approaches have merits. I can certainly see the value of catching FMU exceptions in a clean way...

**Comment by anonymous on 19 Dec 2012 12:04 UTC** Johan, thank you for your conclusion. I did not know that there is a (hidden?) option to run FMU Checker on...

**Comment by iakovn on 8 Jan 2013 22:08 UTC** Replying to [comment:7 anonymous]: > I did not know that there is a (hidden?) option to run FMU Checker on a...