Moritz Firsching
Moritz Firsching
In the replacements cjxl_ng and djxl_ng, the flags have different behavior, so closing this, since it will not be relevant anymore pretty soon.
I suppose we should specify more precisely which version we require for building the benchmark
> This is a side effect of [5df155d](https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/commit/5df155d975bd8ecf091f2b808d41cdd1f37e09b8). I could add an #ifdef guard for this, if necessary. yes, please, @Traneptora! Thanks for looking into it.
I had the impression that this was opened by mistake, so I closed it
Thanks for the report, @a84r7a3rga76fg. I cannot reproduce this. With a random .jpg image, it seems to work. Perhaps you could provide the `input.jpg` where this problem occurs?
Thanks for checking. That still seems like it might be a problem. Can you check with https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/actions/runs/9795797489/artifacts/1668426988 ?
We are planning to make a release soon
@sboukortt good point! any suggestions for alternative phrasing?
see also #3540
Working on a fix. Note that this already works for decoding to ppm and pfm.