Mark Nunberg

the way these macros normally work is that they make your compiler run in a specific 'mode'. According to the POSIX standard (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html): > Additional symbols not required or explicitly...

FWIW, this is what's on my system. All the `_np` decls are guarded by this. It seems you might have luck with `_DARWIN_C_SOURCE`. ``` #if (!defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE)) || defined(_DARWIN_C_SOURCE)...

~~@itamarhaber Don't we already have this?~~ no we don't. We have a `%foo%` syntax, but that's more about levenshtein distance matching than suffix/prefix matching

Hi, we plan to implement this at some point. “Near future” is a relative term, but it basically involves allowing suffix searches as well (e.g. “*foo”) > On Sep 2,...

Perhaps we can add this as an option?

We now offer support for CMake builds; I believe it should be possible to accomplish this using CMake? > On Mar 10, 2019, at 6:19 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >...

hiredis is not (currently) a very complicated library, and it's simpler for most users to just run `make` and not need to potentially learn and/or configure a new tool. When/if...

@noloader a PR is preferable, less typing/clicking on our part :) @justinbrewer as long as the Makefile isn't hurting anyone, and *other* people are submitting patches, I see no reason...

I'm all for it! -- unfortunately however, I don't know if a massive commit changing these names is going to be helpful as it's going to pollute the commit logs..

Thank you, let me see if my connfix branch addresses this.. I recall seeing something like this before. However, we would need to be aware of whether we are in...